Provide All Relevant Information - Submit Query

Student Visa

Profile Check Form

Click Here ×
S
t
u
d
e
n
t

V
i
s
a

Get in Touch

    PPI From Immigration On Unexplained Bank Deposits

    Background

    Sailesh Patel came to New Zealand from India in 2016 to study for Diploma in Business level 5 and 6 in New Zealand. He completed his studies and was on his Post Study Work Visa when he approached Immigration Advisers New Zealand Ltd.(IANZ). Along with his elder sister, a resident of New Zealand, he wanted advice on further study options. Our Senior Licensed Immigration Adviser Vandana Rai discussed with him and understood that Sailesh had an aptitude in serving the elderly. Therefore, Vandana suggested that he take up further studies related to healthcare. As Sailesh did not hold any previous qualification in healthcare, it was a challenge to get him enrolled in the desired course but IANZ made this possible.

    Challenge

    Vandana Rai lodged his student visa application in early 2021. After two months of waiting, Sailesh received a PPI (Potentially Prejudicial Information) from Immigration New Zealand (INZ) to provide more information that could otherwise negatively affect the application. INZ had asked Sailesh to provide all his bank statements for the last six months and explain any transactions over $500 in those statements. He was also asked to provide information on how he will be accessing the funds transferred by his parents, including previous transfers made by his parents.

    It was a challenging task for Vandana and her team as Sailesh had two bank accounts, and each transaction for the last six months had to be checked. Every transaction above $500 had to be explained in a way that was genuine and verifiable. Many transfers from his parents were diligently explained, including the support he received from his sister.

    Outcome

    Vandana Rai and her team’s effort paid off, and Sailesh was granted a student visa. He is now studying his course and is hopeful of joining the dedicated and revered healthcare community of New Zealand soon.

    (The names of clients have been changed to protect their privacy.)

    Disclaimer:

    This article does not constitute immigration advice. Individuals need to seek personal advice from a licensed immigration adviser or lawyer to assess their unique situation.

    Three Years Work Visa For Domestic Violence Victim

    Salma was in her early twenties when her parents got her married to a New Zealand resident visa holder according to the cultural norms in India. Soon after marriage, she got pregnant. Salma, sacrificed her education and career to be a stay-at-home mother. She came to New Zealand with her husband and child in 2017 on a partnership-based work visa.

    Salma had always dreamed about a ‘happily ever after’ marriage. However, things took a turn for the worse when she faced domestic violence at the hands of her husband and in-laws shortly after arriving in New Zealand. Salma then chose to leave her husband and home for the safety of herself and their child. She did not have sufficient money to survive for long in New Zealand and was worried about herself and her child’s future. Salma did not know many people in New Zealand, did not know who she could trust and was too scared to go to the police. She managed to find a room for shelter until she found a way out of her devastating and scary situation. All alone in a foreign country, Salma was determined to survive for the sake of her child.

    Salma knew she could not depend on her husband any longer and had to find a way out of this mess. Browsing the internet, she came across Immigration Advisers New Zealand Ltd website. Immediately she booked an appointment with them and met Senior Licensed Advisers Vandana Rai and Himanshu Rai at their office. She found both Himanshu and Vandana to be very genuine, kind, and considerate. So she felt safe talking to them.

    Vandana and Himanshu Rai assured her that things would get better and provided her with details of all possible visa options. Seeing the situation Salma was in, they encouraged her to apply for jobs and, at the same time, provided her with some course options for her studies. Fortunately, Salma managed to secure a job within a couple of weeks. Thereafter, the process of applying for an Essential Skills Work visa started. Himanshu anticipated all possible concerns raised by Immigration New Zealand and submitted sufficient documents to alleviate all possible concerns.

    Himanshu and his team regularly updated Salma on the progress of her application. As a result, she no longer felt helpless and alone as the IANZ team was there to support her.

    Salma was overjoyed when she heard that she was granted a three-year Essential Skills work visa. She is pleased with her decision to seek assistance from IANZ Ltd.

    Conclusion

    It may be easy to find a Licensed Immigration Adviser to assist with a visa application. However, it is next to impossible to find someone who is compassionate, experienced and competent to assist you with your visa application and at the same time able to understand and support you emotionally. If you face a similar situation or need assistance with your visa application, feel free to email Immigration Advisers New Zealand Ltd. at contact@nzimmigration.info or call +64 09 3790219.

    (Name of the client has been changed to protect their privacy)

    Disclaimer:

    This article does not constitute immigration advice. Individuals need to seek personal advice from a licensed immigration adviser or lawyer to assess their unique situation.

    NZ Border Exception Granted Despite Client’s Adverse Immigration History

    Venkatesh’s wife, Promila, an overseas registered nurse who had always dreamed of working and settling abroad, decided to come to New Zealand to complete her Competence Assessment Program(CAP) to become a registered nurse. However, she knew that travelling to New Zealand would not be easy, especially during the current COVID 19 situation. So she searched for a reliable, experienced and knowledgeable person who could help her and her family with the admission and visa process. One of her friends recommended Vandana Rai, senior Licence Immigration Advisor at Immigration Advisers New Zealand Ltd. (IANZ). Vandana has immense experience with the CAP category of visas and has assisted her friend too with their respective visa applications.

    She contacted IANZ to enquire about the process of travelling to New Zealand with her beloved husband Venkatesh.

    During the initial assessment process and interaction, it emerged that Venkatesh had been deported from two European countries due to an issue with his travel documents when he used to work as a Seaman. A zoom call was arranged between Venkatesh and Vandana for a detailed discussion to understand the circumstances that resulted in his removal. Another experienced licensed adviser, Manmeet Singh Grover, worked with Vandana on this case. Further information and documentation were requested based on which it seemed that circumstances that lead to Venkatesh’s removal were largely beyond his control. Being removed from a country is a potential character concern that comes under the purview of section 15 of the Immigration Act 2009, which only permits a grant of visa through a special direction by Immigration New Zealand (INZ).

    The challenge now was to convince INZ of the same. It was challenging because the INZ website only provides limited space to explain the circumstances when applying for a border exception. There is no provision to upload any documents. This is where Vandana’s immense experience benefited the client. Vandana and her team identified the challenges and pitfalls in advance and put in a lot of effort and time to explain the applicant’s circumstances accurately to INZ.

    INZ issued an Invitation to Apply (ITA) to Venkatesh and his wife to apply for a Critical Purpose Visitor Visa, specifying that supporting documentary evidence must be provided with the visa application. The documentary evidence was submitted along with a detailed explanation based on which INZ was satisfied that the circumstances of his removal were beyond his control and that he met the character requirements for entry to New Zealand. INZ raised no further concerns and the visa was approved.

    The couple is happy to be together in New Zealand and Promila is doing well in her course. We wish them the very best for their future.

    (The names of clients have been changed to protect their privacy.)

    Disclaimer:

    This article does not constitute immigration advice. Individuals need to seek personal advice from a licensed immigration adviser or lawyer to assess their unique situation.

    Three Year Post Study Work Visa Approved Despite Gap In Studies

    Kumudu arrived in New Zealand in 2018 to pursue her higher education, and she selected a course related to sports. Despite being an offbeat course, she completed her course successfully in the first half of 2019 and graduated as a top academic student. Kumudu realising that she could excel in this field desired to upskill herself and accordingly planned to enrol in a Level 6 course with the same education provider.

    Unfortunately for her, the Level 6 course was not available in semester 2 of 2019. Hence, Kumudu had to delay her re-enrolment till February 2020. However, in the interim, she decided not to sit idle and enrolled on an English language course to improve her communication skills and prepare herself for the job market. She started the Level 6 course as planned and completed it successfully in 2020.

    It was now time for Kumudu to apply for a Post Study Work Visa and her friend, a fellow student, suggested that she apply on her own as he believed the visa application process to be a straightforward one. He had studied the same courses as Kumudu, applied on his own, and got a visa valid for one year. However, Kumudu decided to seek professional assistance as she believed she was at a disadvantage as she was not well versed with immigration instructions.

    From experience, Kumudu knew she could trust Vandana Rai of Immigration Advisers NZ Ltd (IANZ) as the best person to assist her with the visa application. Vandana had earlier helped Kumudu with her first-time student visa application in 2019, and she was already impressed with Vandana’s professionalism and knowledge concerning immigration matters. Therefore, she immediately called Vandana and scheduled an appointment.

    Kamudu met Vandana and explained her situation. She further explained how her friend received a visa valid only for one year. Kumudu was worried as her future in New Zealand seemed unclear. She was not confident about what she should do. The pandemic added further stress as New Zealand was considered one of the safest countries to live in during the pandemic, and she was not ready to leave it so soon.

    Within minutes Kumudu knew she was in safe hands as Vandana not only explained the existing instructions but assured her that everything would turn out well. Furthermore, Kumudu knew she made the right decision by approaching Vandana yet again about her visa application.

    Vandana submitted Kumudu’s visa application. As expected, she received a Potentially Prejudicial Information (PPI) letter from Immigration New Zealand informing her that she will be granted a visa for only one year as she has not completed both levels the same year or consecutive years.

    The PPI allowed Vandana to present a proper response to INZ explaining the circumstances which prevented Kumudu from completing both levels of studies in consecutive years. Vandana advised Kumudu to obtain a letter from her college to support her claims, and she submitted the same to INZ along with the response letter. Vandana requested INZ to consider the circumstances and to grant a 3-year post-study work visa as an exception to instructions. This was an alien concept to Kumudu. However, her confidence in Vandana multiplied when she read the response letter submitted to INZ. Kumudu was highly impressed with Vandana’s abilities and was glad she entrusted her future in Vandana’s capable hands.

    Kumudu received an email from IANZ within a few weeks. She was nervous about opening her email as it had just been a few weeks since Vandana had submitted her response to INZ. Kumudu could not believe her eyes when she read that her visa had been approved for three years. She was overjoyed and relieved that her belief in Vandana was not in vain, and as expected, Vandana did not disappoint her.

    Conclusion

    Immigration instructions may seem simple at face value. However, there is an in-depth complexity that requires proper understanding and interpretation of the instructions. You may believe that making an application on your own will help you save money. Still, the truth is that engaging the services of a competent and experienced Licensed Immigration Adviser will enable you to save your time, money and will grant you the outcome that you desire.

    (Name of the client has been changed to protect their privacy)

    Disclaimer:

    This article does not constitute immigration advice. Individuals need to seek personal advice from a licensed immigration adviser or lawyer to assess their unique situation.

    Job Suitability Related To Overseas Qualification And Work Experience

    Maria is a talented hairdresser from France. She came to New Zealand on Working Holiday Visa (WHV) and liked the country so much that she wanted to extend her stay and explore her options, including staying permanently.

    As her WHV was coming to an end, she got a job offer as a hairdresser in a renowned Salon in New Zealand. She quickly completed the visa documentation and lodged her visa application with her employer’s assistance.

    Unfortunately, she did not know that there was more to it, including the complicated assessment criteria around the overseas qualification and work experience. So when her visa was declined, she did not know what to do.

    How did Immigration Advisers NZ Ltd tackle the situation?

    Someone suggested Maria to hire an experienced Licensed Immigration Adviser. So she started looking for immigration advisers on Google. After reading multiple good reviews about Immigration Advisers New Zealand Ltd, she booked an appointment with our senior Licensed Immigration Adviser, Vandana Rai, New Zealand’s top immigration adviser.

    Having years of experience in the immigration field, Vandana Rai immediately realized that INZ had incorrectly assessed Maria’s application. Undue weightage was given to past advertisements and employers’ ongoing social media attempts to find a suitable candidate. Moreover, there were questions asked around testing her competency in the hairdresser’s role.

    Without wasting any time, Vandana Rai began preparing for a reconsideration request. Vandana addressed minute details like how the employer had assessed Maria’s hairdressing skills. A strong case was made for Maria, and she responded to each reason for decline with conclusive evidence.

    Conclusion:

    Due to the detailed explanation and evidence provided, INZ approved Maria’s reconsideration request, and she was granted a 3-year work visa. Maria was delighted and thankful to team IANZ.

    Immigration instructions may seem simple at face value; however, there is an in-depth complexity that requires a proper understanding and interpretation of the instructions. Maria was happy to have availed of the services of such an experienced immigration adviser like Vandana Rai.
    (Name of the client has been changed to protect their privacy)

    Disclaimer:

    This article does not constitute immigration advice. Individuals need to seek personal advice from a licensed immigration adviser or lawyer to assess their unique situation.

    Critical purpose To Enter New Zealand During Border Closure

    Manpreet Kaur is wife of Parminder Singh and is a work visa holder based in New Zealand. She met with an accident and suffered trauma and concussion. Although she was not hospitalised, she needed help with her rehabilitation and recovery from the injuries. As she has no immediate family in New Zealand, the accident not only had a physical impact on Manpreet but also resulted in emotional and mental trauma. To recover mentally and physically, she needed her husband Parminder Singh to be in NZ to provide her with much-needed support.

    Manpreet Kaur knew that due to the strict border exception criteria of Immigration New Zealand (INZ), getting a visa for the family member would be challenging. She started looking out for the best Licenced Immigration Adviser (LIA) who could solve her problem without any hassles. She got to know about Immigration Adviser New Zealand Ltd from one of our previous clients.

    Manpreet immediately booked an appointment with our Senior LIA Vandana Rai and explained her situation. She also provided some medical documents. Vandana and her team consisting of another LIA Manmeet Singh Grover reviewed the documents.

    Based on the initial review, additional documents were requested to fully understand Manpreet’s medical condition in order to determine if it would warrant a border exception for her husband. The threshold for border exception under the humanitarian category is very high and INZ requires detailed information and documents to determine if a border exception is warranted. Our experienced licensed immigration advisers were able to guide Manpreet in obtaining the relevant medical documents to support her case.

    Based on all the evidence and information collected a detailed border exception request was submitted with all the necessary information. It is important to note that the INZ website only provides limited space to explain the circumstances and there is no provision to upload the documents. This is where the skills and competency of an adviser come into the picture. Based on the initial information submitted, INZ requested the documentary evidence of Manpreet’s medical condition and the same was provided.

    INZ was satisfied with the information and evidence submitted and invited Parminder to apply for a Critical Purpose Visitor Visa (CPVV). The CPVV application was lodged along with all the detailed    documentary evidence and relevant information in support of Manpreet’s condition along with other evidence as required by the immigration instructions.
    Parminder’s visa has been approved and he is arranging to travel to New Zealand to be with his wife Manpreet Kaur. Manpreet is eagerly awaiting his arrival in New Zealand. We wish Manpreet a speedy recovery and hope that Parminder’s arrival will provide her with much needed emotional support for her wellbeing.

    (The names of clients have been changed to protect their privacy.)

    Disclaimer:

    This article does not constitute immigration advice. Individuals need to seek personal advice from a Licensed Immigration Adviser or lawyer to assess their unique situation.

    Providing Identified Cultural Tradition Evidence

    Seema, an Indian, got married to Prashant in February 2021. It was an arranged marriage, and Seema’s neighbour was the match-maker.

    Seema lodged her visitor visa application under the culturally arranged marriage category on her own. She had done some research before applying, based on the research, she was confident that all the required evidence was given with the application to satisfy immigration requirements. However, she failed to mention or provide any evidence to show that the marriage was arranged and the arrangements for the marriage,  including facilitation of the initial selection of the persons was done by persons who are not parties to the marriage.

    During the processing of the application, INZ identified some concerns and sent a Potentially Prejudicial Information (PPI) letter to her. The immigration officer stated that he was not satisfied that the marriage follows an identified and recognised cultural tradition. 

    Seema’s husband Prashant who was in New Zealand at that time got extremely worried and distressed upon seeing the PPI letter. He spoke to his friend about the issue and was advised to contact our Senior Licenced Immigration Adviser, Vandana Rai. His friend’s partner’s visa was lodged through Vandana, and the application was approved.

    Prashant met Vandana at the Immigration Adviser New Zealand’s, Auckland office with the PPI letter. Vandana reviewed the letter, had a Zoom meeting with Seema and agreed to assist with her application.

    The main requirement under this category is to be able to demonstrate that the marriage follows an identified and recognised cultural tradition where the arrangements for the marriage, including facilitation of the initial selection of the persons to be married, were made by persons who are not parties to the marriage. The immigration officer clearly stated in the PPI letter that the documents provided did not satisfy this very important requirement.

    This requirement is not always easy to substantiate with documentary evidence since in most cultures, the initial interaction or meeting is done face to face or the family members may not have kept or maintained evidence of communication. If the applicant is not able to demonstrate to the immigration officer’s satisfaction that the marriage followed an identified and recognised cultural tradition, then the application may be declined.

    These applications require in-depth knowledge and correct interpretation of New Zealand Immigration Instructions to get a favourable outcome. This was where the extensive experience of Vandana and her team came to the aid of Seema and Prashant. Vandana’s meticulous approach and knowledge enabled the couple to gather all the possible documentary evidence, and whatever could not be demonstrated by documents was explained in details by Vandana in her cover letter to INZ.

    The time and efforts put into the gathering of documents and evidence in support of the application along with the detailed explanation provided, enabled Seema to get her visitor visa approved. Since this was a relationship-based visa, Seema was able to travel to New Zealand despite the current border closure.

    Seema is now in New Zealand and the couple is delighted to be together. Team Immigration Advisers New Zealand wish them the very best for their future.

    (The names of clients have been changed to protect their privacy)

    Disclaimer: This article does not constitute immigration advice. Individuals need to seek personal advice from a licensed immigration adviser or lawyer to assess their unique situation.

    Course changed from higher level to lower level

    Sylvia D’Cruz is from India. She belongs to an exceptionally well to do family who wanted her to pursue her higher education by doing top-level courses. Under parental pressure, she enrolled for a Master of Engineering Studies in New Zealand.

    As engineering was neither her interest nor aptitude, she struggled with her studies. This misalignment resulted in her showing apparent poor academic progress. The associated stress then led to her having health issues.

    Being an intelligent person, she started doing online research to find a solution and came across a video uploaded by our Senior Licensed Immigration Adviser, Vandana Rai. In the YouTube video, the adviser had talked about “How to become a registered teacher in New Zealand. The content of the video covered education pathways leading to “Teaching in NZ? 

    Sylvia became very motivated by this video as she had always inspired to be a teacher. She had always secretly admired this profession. On sensing an opportunity to herself become a teacher, she thought she now had a purpose in life. She became interested in studying Early Childhood Education, but she was not sure if she can change her course from Engineering to Teaching.

    When she contacted Immigration Advisers NZ Ltd., she was low on morale as her poor academic progress in the engineering course had tampered with her confidence and health. She, however scheduled an appointment with Senior Licensed Adviser Vandana Rai and met her to seek clarity and awareness.

    During the meeting, Vandana explained all the requirements to apply for the course, alongside explaining the possible concerns an immigration officer may have in her application during the assessment. 

    Vandana highlighted the concern that the immigration officer would have for discontinuing the qualification, which in her case was a Master’s degree. Likely concern could also be related to her proposed qualification not aligning with her previous studies or work apart from ongoing poor academic progress. In a combination of her circumstances, it was clear that a perception of her not being a genuine and bona fide student could have formed during the assessment of her application.

    Sylvia was highly impressed with the way Vandana explained her everything upfront. She decided to place her career in the hands of Vandana based on her belief and confidence that Vandana and her team will be able to handle her case. Once it was done by signing the client agreement she was ready to make all the efforts required to successfully apply for the Teaching qualification.

    It took a couple of months for Sylvia to prepare her documents as one of the entry requirements for the course was getting her previous qualification which she completed in India, to be assessed by New Zealand Qualification Authority (NZQA).

    Vandana made every effort to prepare a decision ready onshore student visa application for Sylvia. She anticipated all the possible concerns and requested the necessary supporting documents to be submitted along with the application. Vandana also submitted a detailed cover letter and all the supporting documents when she submitted Sylvia’s onshore student visa application.

    Based on the documents and the cover letter submitted, INZ approved the student visa of Sylvia to study Graduate Diploma in Early Childhood Teaching Level 7 (ECE). Sylvia was excited and thrilled on receiving the good news and thanked Vandana and her team. It was yet another successful application in the credit score of Immigration Advisers New Zealand Ltd.

    Sylvia has completed her studies this year and is currently on her Post Study Work Visa. She has already received her New Zealand Teacher’s registration. She is now eligible to apply for residence and is waiting for Immigration New Zealand to resume the selection of Expression of Interests (EOI’s).

    The Moral of the Story: The students in New Zealand must obtain immigration advice from an experienced and competent Licensed Immigration Adviser. If you are unsure of your current studies, looking for a change in qualification or level of study, looking to change your education provider feel free to email Immigration Advisers New Zealand Ltd at contact@nzimmigration.info or call on +64 09 3790219.

    (The name of the client has been changed to protect their privacy)

    Disclaimer: This article does not constitute immigration advice. Individuals need to seek personal advice from a licensed immigration adviser or lawyer to assess their unique situation.

    Wrong Course Choice Leading to Residence Visa Roadblocks in NZ

    Celine had come to New Zealand from India on a student visa. She is married with two young children. Celine intended to study and then find a job during her post-study work visa. She knew that she could fulfill her desire to become a New Zealand resident by getting a skilled job.

    Celine completed PG Diploma in Business Administration and fulfilled the criteria to get a three-year post-study work visa. While on her post-study work visa, she was able to secure skilled jobs, but those jobs were not leading to a suitable pathway to residency.

    Through her online research, she was aware that Immigration New Zealand’s assessment of resident visa applications was not favourable for her type of employment. Moreover, as Celin was the primary applicant, her partner’s and two dependent children visas depended on her. She started to worry as her post-study work visa neared its expiry date. Things looked bleak for her and her family, and uncertainty loomed large on her face.

    Around this time, she started her online research for the best Licensed Immigration Adviser for guidance and came across Vandana Rai’s profile. The 5-star ratings on google coupled with excellent reviews prompted her to establish contact with Immigration Advisers New Zealand (IANZ) team.

    Initial Consultation

    When Celine first met Vandana, she was an unsure, anxious, and nervous person worried about her future in New Zealand. However, she was able to convey that she was willing to work hard, upskill if necessary and wanted to stay lawfully in New Zealand along with her family.

    Vandana Rai discussed with Celine the available options based on her individual skills, qualification, employment and experience. Vandana has a career counselling and psychology background; hence her job advice in the immigration context always caters for her client’s penchant. During her conversation, Vandana soon concluded that Celine being a mother of two young school-going children, had a natural fondness for them. It was also aptly reflected by her regular volunteering for their school activities.

    Vandana then suggested to Celine that she pursue a study programme related to Teaching Early Childhood Education. The course could fulfill her long-term plans and also secure a career where she could enjoy and excel. Celine decided to go through the course contents. She realized that the proposed course offered job security and a concrete pathway to residency as it was a registered occupation.

    In her meeting sessions, Vandana further advised on what skills and knowledge Celine would gain and how the course would lead to teachers registration in New Zealand.

    Getting teachers registration would also qualify Celine for the priority queue list of INZ for assessment of resident visa applications. Moreover, teachers are always in demand around the world. Furthermore, the qualification could give her additional points as it was a level 9 qualification.

    Notwithstanding, Celine was apprehensive about whether her decision would convince Immigration New Zealand (INZ) that she was contemplating an entirely new academic stream. Vandana then took on the responsibility of putting across strong advocacy on her behalf in INZ. Her experience and professional competency assisted in demonstrating to INZ that Celine’s intentions were bonafide and she was meeting the requirements of immigration instructions.

    Successful Outcome

    Due to the strong advocacy and detailed explanation of surrounding circumstances and intentions supported by documentary evidence, the application had a positive outcome.

    Celine was highly grateful to the team of IANZ. In her client review, she specifically mentioned that we had provided a prudent option and ensured that all the documentation was up to the mark to ensure a favourable outcome.

    She was so thankful to us that she and her family’s lives had turned a new leaf with the potential and comforting certainty for a better and more secure future.

    Conclusion: The students in New Zealand must obtain immigration advice from an experienced and competent Licensed Immigration Adviser. If you are unsure of your career and immigration pathway, current studies, looking for a change in qualification or level of study, or education provider feel free to email Immigration Advisers New Zealand Ltd at contact@nzimmigration.info or call on +64 09 3790219.

    (The name of the client has been changed to protect their privacy)

    Disclaimer: This article does not constitute immigration advice. Individuals need to seek personal advice from a licensed immigration adviser or lawyer to assess their unique situation.

    Complications At Visa Renewal Stage Despite Successful Reconsideration Request

    Sridharan had come to study in New Zealand for a postgraduate qualification, but he could not pass all the papers and complete them in time due to certain unavoidable circumstances. He had to apply for an extension of his Student Visa, which was first declined by Immigration New Zealand (INZ) and then reconsidered and approved. However, a warning accompanied the approval of the reconsideration request to maintain high attendance and show satisfactory academic progress. The complications arose when Sridharan once again found himself failing in papers and having low attendance. These events set the stage for an immigration complexity threatening to derail his immigration journey.

    Initial Challenges Faced

    All foreign nationals to “Study in New Zealand” require a Student Visa. So did Sridharan, who belongs to the southern part of India. He hails from an educated family of engineers and teachers. He had been a brilliant student throughout his academic journey in India.

    Based on his previous qualification in India, he chose a postgraduate course to do in New Zealand. He applied for a Postgraduate Diploma in Information Technology- Level 8 from a Category 1 education provider and commenced his studies once he entered the country. He had reckoned that he would adapt to the new learning environment and achieve his educational goal, given his academic ability. However, it was not to be. He was overwhelmed with the unique learning and social environment. This change resulted in him not being able to keep pace with the demands of the course despite his best efforts.

    First Brush With Team IANZ

    INZ had previously declined Sridharan’s student visa extension in March 2020 due to low attendance and unsatisfactory academic progress. He had some anxiety issues, could not adapt to the new learning environment, and worried about his parent’s wellbeing in India.

    Having received a refusal letter from the INZ visa office, he had connected with the IANZ team based on his online research about the best immigration adviser in New Zealand. Upon receiving his mail, IANZ team understood the urgency of the matter and responded post-haste.

    Senior License Immigration Adviser Ms Vandana Rai gave him undivided personal attention to understand his complex immigration situation. She and her team scrutinised the case, assessed, and identified additional evidence that could mitigate INZ concerns. Team IANZ submitted a reconsideration request to INZ within seven days of the decline letter being received.

    For those who don’t know, a reconsideration request is a complicated representation to make in INZ. It is critical to address each reason for the decline and provide the necessary explanation/documents to mitigate the concerns raised by INZ.

    In Sridharan case, not only his attendance was low, his academic progression was also a concern. Vandana advocated his compelling reasons with various accurate and credible pieces of evidence.

    Owing to the strong advocacy, the reconsideration request got approved as an exception to immigration instructions from INZ. However, the approval also had a caveat attached. INZ had warned Sridharan that ‘failure to attend the course at all times, make satisfactory progress in class, or breach any other visa condition may result in future visas being declined or could make him liable for deportation (as per D2.15.15).

    Present circumstances 

    Unfortunately for Sridharan, his low attendance and poor academic record continued regardless of his efforts. The main reasons being the pandemic due to which the situation in his home country deteriorated. As a result, he became too concerned over his family’s wellbeing. His past anxiety issues also made things worse.

    He once again had no option but to apply for an extension of his student visa. He found himself facing the same challenge – his attendance was below 85%, and he was short of clearing three subjects.As there was a warning accompanying his previous visa approval, there seemed almost no possibility of a favourable outcome this time. It appeared that he was destined to leave New Zealand and go back home.

    Notwithstanding, we at IANZ took up the challenge and stepped in for our client in his difficult time. Team IANZ believes that whatever the challenges, we must remain dedicated to serving our clients. We prepared the application by stretching our cognitive abilities. We provided each day’s attendance and reasons for each absence with supporting evidence. Vandana and her team highlighted his endeavours for each failed subject and his efforts to clear it.

    We submitted his application wherein the evidence around his attendance and progress itself consisted of 76 annexures. In addition, the submission contained a detailed explanation of over 2,000 words.

    In the end, team IANZ’s advocacy was accepted by INZ, and the student visa application approved without even a concern or PPI letter. It was a significant achievement (for him/us) considering his adverse immigration history.

    While team IANZ was happy with the decision, INZ’s unbiased decision-making process deserves praise too.

    The Moral of the story – Whatever be the challenges, a trustful, honest, caring, respectful and professional Licensed Immigration Adviser will give the best to help migrants build a better future in New Zealand. However, it is for you to take the first step to engage a trustworthy License Immigration Adviser who empathises with you, understands your problems and can turn your adversity into an opportunity.

    (Name of the client has been changed to protect their privacy)

    Disclaimer:This article does not constitute immigration advice. Individuals need to seek personal advice from a licensed immigration adviser or lawyer to assess their unique situation.

    Culturally Arranged Marriage Visa Challenges Faced Due To Pandemic

    Barun is a New Zealand Resident and is currently working as a male nurse. He is now married to Lakshi.

    Barun and Lakshi were introduced to each other by their respective families in 2019. They got married in India according to their traditions and customs in November 2020.

    After marriage, the couple decided to move to New Zealand as Barun could not take long leave due to the shortage of nurses in New Zealand and their workload. Since his profession falls under the critical purpose category, Barun knew that he could take his wife along, so he applied for a partnership based visa in December 2020, after a month of getting married.

    The applicant later changed this visa category to a Critical Purpose Visitor Visa (CPVV) as per the Immigration New Zealand (INZ) contact centre suggestion.

    Soon after that, their visa was declined by INZ, saying that they aren’t satisfied with their living together evidence provided. Barun was left wondering about the reasons for the decline. He was unable to comprehend the logic behind the decision of INZ case officer. He was heartbroken and had no choice but to return to New Zealand without his wife. Once he was in New Zealand, he started searching for an experienced and reputed Licensed Immigration Adviser who could guide and advise him and his wife Lakshi.

    While looking for the best immigration advisor, he came across Immigration Advisers New Zealand Limited (IANZ). He was impressed by the positive reviews from customer’s testimonials or customer’s reviews on google.

    After reading all the reviews, he decided to write an e-mail to IANZ to get the best immigration advice and visa option for Lakshi. He received a response from the IANZ team on the same day. Team IANZ scheduled a zoom meeting for the couple with the Senior Licensed Immigration Adviser Vandana Rai. She explained the reasons for the previous decline and gave out the possible visa options for Lakshi.

    Vandana explained to the couple about the immigration instructions related to a partnership-based visa under the Culturally Arranged Visa category. This concept was alien to the couple, but Vandana, an expert in partnership-based visa categories, patiently explained the supporting documents required and the visa application process requirements.

    Immediately after hearing Vandana Rai, Barun and Lakshi realised that their future was safely into experienced hands and decided to seek her assistance with their visa application. They signed the client contract and asked her to represent Lakshi’s application in INZ.

    After that, Vandana and her team handled every aspect of the new visa application promptly and efficiently. The client communication was quick and precise, and the team at IANZ was always available to clarify any doubts.

    Vandana explained to the couple that Lakshi must lodge her visa application within three months. Also, the couple should provide evidence to show their marriage was arranged by a third party which is one of the primary requirement to apply under the said category.

    Barun faced few difficulties as he created his matrimonial account as his mother was not familiar with using the computer and internet. Barun worried whether this would cause a potential concern with his application and decided to speak to Vandana.

    Vandana and her team guided Barun regarding all documents he could provide to prove that a third party arranged the marriage. After getting undivided personal attention and help in smoothly navigating the complex immigration situation, Barun is extremely pleased about his decision to obtain Vandana’s assistance with Lakshi’s visa application.

    With the help of IANZ team, the couple managed to provide all documents to satisfy the INZ that their marriage followed the identified and accepted cultural tradition.

    In addition, Vandana provided a detailed cover letter anticipating and addressing all potential concerns INZ may have. The hard work of Vandana and her team paid off, and it was another success story for IANZ as INZ approved Lakshi’s visa.

    Moral of the story:

    Immigration is an ever-changing legal arena. Our office is acutely aware of the requirement to be abreast with new immigration policies and instructions. This commitment to the knowledge of the latest immigration updates enables us to offer our clientele correct legal representation.

    At IANZ, we make sure that our customer leaves satisfied because excellent service is the foundation of a sustainable business. We are always ready to handle the curveballs.

    “Your customer doesn’t care how much you know until they know how much you care”

    (Name of the client has been changed to protect their privacy)

    Disclaimer: This article does not constitute immigration advice. Individuals need to seek personal advice from a licensed immigration adviser or lawyer to assess their unique situation.

    Lack of Relationship Evidence and Previous Overstay in NZ

    Jack and Ella were in a relationship, which was seven years old and located in South Africa. While Ella had got her three-year Essential Skills Work Visa (ESWV) to come to New Zealand, Jack too had plans to accompany her. As per the plan, Jack quickly completed his work commitments and applied to Immigration New Zealand (INZ) for a partnership-based work visa. They both wanted to come together to New Zealand.

    Jack had applied from South Africa on his own and submitted the partnership documents as per his understanding and research. He was confident that the documents he had got together would be sufficient to get approval considering that the couple was in a long-standing relationship for over seven years.

    Jack was taken aback when he received a letter of concern called Potentially Prejudicial Information (PPI) from INZ, stating that they were not satisfied that the documents provided demonstrated that the couple had been living together in a genuine and stable relationship. The letter also raised concerns about Jack’s bona fides as he overstayed in New Zealand previously by six months when he visited New Zealand with his family around ten years ago at the age of 20.

    Jack got worried when he saw the PPI letter; he understood that he needed expert help or else INZ will decline his application from the letter’s contents.

    Before he sought the help of an expert Licensed Immigration Adviser, he struggled to determine what else could he provide to mitigate INZ concerns about the nature of his relationship with Ella.

    He then decided to google search for a good immigration adviser in New Zealand and came across Himanshu Rai and his team of Immigration Advisers in AucklandHe went to the home page of website got in touch with Himanshu, and shared the letter of concern. The same day, the advising team got on a Zoom call with Jack and Ela, discussed the situation, reassured them, and agreed to take over the case to represent Jack in INZ.

    Himanshu and the team undertook a detailed assessment of couple’s circumstances and the documents previously submitted to INZ.

    The couple was then advised on the additional possible documents that they could submit to mitigate the concerns raised by INZ. Based on the diligent work of the advising team, the couple was able to provide almost 30 additional pieces of documentary evidence in support of their relationship (this was when the couple thought they had no other evidence). The case study shows how important and vital it is to consult an experienced licensed immigration adviser who understands the in-depth nuances of immigration instructions and requirements for a partnership-based application. The additional documents were submitted to INZ along with a detailed explanation in a response letter. The advocacy was quite strong too.

    Jack’s circumstances that led to his overstay were ascertained by the team, explained to INZ in the response letter, and corroborated by the same documents.

    Additional evidence was also provided to INZ to demonstrate how Jack is a bona fide temporary entrant and how he meets the relevant immigration instructions.

    INZ approved his visa within four days of submitting the response without asking for any additional information/documentation. They were satisfied that Jack met all the partnership and bona fide instructions requirements to be granted a work visa. The couple was delighted to receive the visa, moved to New Zealand, and were very pleased with the outcome. As soon as they arrived in Auckland, they visited Himanshu to thank him personally for all his help, support, and professionalism.

    Jack and Ella are doing well for themselves and are now well settled in New Zealand. We wish them the very best for their future.

    If you are unsure of your eligibility for partnership based visa, feel free to email Immigration Advisers New Zealand Ltd at contact@nzimmigration.info or call  on +64 09 3790219

    Disclaimer: The name of the client has been changed to protect their privacy.

    Complications Faced By Temporary Visa Holder While Entering New Zealand

    Harris along with his dependents was in New Zealand on a temporary work visa. He was a flyer with a pilot license. His license was due to expire soon.

    He was therefore asked by his employer to travel overseas to complete urgent training in order to keep his flying license valid. As apparent this license was an integral part of his job and without a valid license, he would not have been able to continue in his role. He found himself in a real dilemma due to the border restrictions. Continue reading “Complications Faced By Temporary Visa Holder While Entering New Zealand”

    Unsubstantiated Complaint Against The Primary Applicant (Student) Recorded By Immigration

    Dharmender is in New Zealand on a temporary visa and happily married with a child. He had applied for a Student Visa in July 2020. Since he was the primary applicant his partner and his child’s visas were dependent on the outcome of his visa application.

    Initially, Immigration New Zealand (INZ) during the assessment of his application identified issues around his short attendance and academic progress. It is important to understand that when there is a concern around academic progression from INZ it essentially means that INZ considers the applicants study progress as unsatisfactory. This may be due to not clearing few papers etc. Additional documentary evidence related to funds was also requested. Although Dharmender had his reasons to justify INZ concerns and the same were forwarded to INZ hoping that it was a routine matter but it was not.

    INZ came back to him requesting more information in September 2020. This time the letter accentuated multiple concerns around numerous transactions in his bank statements. Updated bank statements and IRD summary (New Zealand Tax Returns) were also requested.

    All the concerns were addressed by our subsequent response as part of the advocacy. The response included detailed evidence of each identified and questioned transaction supported by our explanation of the same. We reckoned that this time all the doubts of INZ would be cleared. However, it was not to be.

    In November 2020, another letter was received from INZ. This time there were different concerns over evidence of funds. Not to be deterred, the applicant provided additional evidence and we prepared our response. By now, the detailed evidence of all the accounts, all the sources of deposits, he held in New Zealand and his native country was provided to INZ. All the large deposits in these accounts were explained with supporting evidence. After this response, we thought that INZ would surely decide the application, even if they were thinking of declining it. INZ surprised us once again.

    We received another communication in December 2020. The new concern was around the trail of funds from his father’s account to his NZ account. We had explained it earlier, however, we presented our response in a more detailed and precise manner within the period granted. At this juncture, the summer vacation was approaching, and the matter moved to January 2021. To make the matter more alarming, the applicant, his wife, and his child’s interim visas were expiring in January 2021.

    Still, no decision from INZ.

    In the interim period, we had also requested for the applicant’s client file records under the Official Information Act (OIA) from INZ. On its scrutiny, it was found that there was a complaint against the applicant recorded by INZ in their system. The complaint duly investigated, could not be substantiated as there was no adverse remark against our client.

    One week from the expiry date, we requested INZ to decide the applications and provided our reasons for the same. The logic given was that we could have filed a reconsideration request as long as they were lawfully in New Zealand. Unfortunately, there was no decision given and even the interim visas ultimately expired. It was highly intriguing for us that for six months, a student visa was not decided.

    With no other alternative left, we filed a Section 61 Request for the primary applicant and his dependents.

    It took over 6 months of our relentless efforts, our communications to INZ containing over 5,000 words apart from analysis of voluminous documents, demonstration of a high level of competency and legal advocacy before, the family’s visa applications were decided and visas granted.

    The Moral of the story – Even if we are bona fide in our conduct and our intentions are good, the outcome may still depend on a trustworthy License Immigration Adviser who understands the clients’ version and is ready to fight for the client till the last.

    Medical PPI Case Study

    Shruti lodged her Post-Study Work Visa application on her own. Within a few days of lodgement, she received a Potentially Prejudicial Information (PPI) letter from Immigration New Zealand (INZ). This letter of concern from INZ informed her that she did not have an Acceptable Standard of Health (ASH). The letter of concern also mentioned the relevant immigration instructions requiring applicants applying for certain type of visas to have ASH. The relevant immigration instruction are A4.15 Acceptable standard of health (applicants for temporary entry class visas)

    Shruti was undergoing treatment for a medical condition because of which INZ sent a letter of concern or PPI. The letter stated that she can provide more documents and if the final decision of the INZ Medical Assessor is that she does not have an ASH, the application may be declined.

    Shruti got worried after receiving the letter and was not sure what documents she could provide to mitigate the concerns raised by INZ. She was anxious and nervous that if she was unable to provide the right documents, she may be required to leave New Zealand. This is when she decided to search online for a good and credible Licensed Immigration Adviser (LIA) and came across the profile of Vandana Rai. She contacted Vandana who went through the INZ letter and medical documents of Shruti. One more adviser from our organisation, Manmeet Grover also worked with Vandana on this matter and together they were able to guide Shruti on the further course of action. This involved requesting Shruti’s medical records from INZ, requesting a prolonged extension from INZ (by providing the required supporting evidence), advising Shruti to contact the relevant medical professional and doing some additional tests to alleviate the concerns raised by the INZ Medical Assessor.

    Because of the medical condition involved, the medical consultation process was long, but a regular line of communication was maintained between Shruti, LIA’s and INZ. We submitted our response to INZ along with the supporting medical documents, based on which the Immigration Medical Assessors determined that Shruti now met the requirements of the health instructions and was considered to have an ASH status.

    The time, effort and correct guidance provided by our advisors helped in mitigating INZ’s concerns and Shruti received her three-years Post Study Work Visa. Shruti was delighted to receive her work visa and continue her journey in New Zealand. We wish Shruti good health and the very best for the future.

    Disclaimer: The name of the client has been changed to protect their privacy.